draft-ietf-grow-wkc-behavior-05.txt		draft-ietf-grow-wkc-behavior-06.txt
	Network Working Group J. Borkenhagen		Network Working Group J. Borkenhagen
	Internet-Draft AT&T		Internet-Draft AT&T
	Updates: 1997 (if approved) R. Bush		Updates: 1997 (if approved) R. Bush
	Intended status: Standards Track Internet Initiative Japan		Intended status: Standards Track Internet Initiative Japan
	Expires: December 1, 2019 R. Bonica		Expires: December 12, 2019 R. Bonica
	Juniper Networks		Juniper Networks
	S. Bayraktar		S. Bayraktar
	Cisco Systems		Cisco Systems
	May 30, 2019		June 10, 2019
	Well-Known Community Policy Behavior		Well-Known Community Policy Behavior
	draft-ietf-grow-wkc-behavior-05		draft-ietf-grow-wkc-behavior-06
	Abstract		Abstract
	Well-Known BGP Communities are manipulated differently across various		Well-Known BGP Communities are manipulated differently across various
	current implementations; resulting in difficulties for operators.		current implementations; resulting in difficulties for operators.
	Network operators should deploy consistent community handling across		Network operators should deploy consistent community handling across
	their networks while taking the inconsistent behaviors from the		their networks while taking the inconsistent behaviors from the
	various BGP implementations into consideration.. This document		various BGP implementations into consideration.. This document
	recommends specific actions to limit future inconsistency, namely BGP		recommends specific actions to limit future inconsistency, namely BGP
	implementors must not create further inconsistencies from this point		implementors must not create further inconsistencies from this point
	skipping to change at page 2, line 4 ¶		skipping to change at page 2, line 4 ¶
	Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering		Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
	Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute		Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
	working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-		working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
	Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.		Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
	Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months		Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
	and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any		and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
	time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference		time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
	material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."		material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
	This Internet-Draft will expire on December 1, 2019.		This Internet-Draft will expire on December 12, 2019.
	Copyright Notice		Copyright Notice
	Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the		Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
	document authors. All rights reserved.		document authors. All rights reserved.
	This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal		This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
	Provisions Relating to IETF Documents		Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
	(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of		(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
	publication of this document. Please review these documents		publication of this document. Please review these documents
	skipping to change at page 5, line 49 ¶		skipping to change at page 5, line 49 ¶
	neighbor ASN, the operator should confirm with that neighbor how the		neighbor ASN, the operator should confirm with that neighbor how the
	community will be treated.		community will be treated.
	7. Security Considerations		7. Security Considerations
	Surprising defaults and/or undocumented behaviors are not good for		Surprising defaults and/or undocumented behaviors are not good for
	security. This document attempts to remedy that.		security. This document attempts to remedy that.
	8. IANA Considerations		8. IANA Considerations
	This document has no IANA Considerations; though the IANA may wish to		The IANA is requested to list this document as an additional
	refer to this document, if/when published, in [IANA-WKC].		reference for the [IANA-WKC] registry.
	9. Acknowledgments		9. Acknowledgments
	The authors thank Martijn Schmidt, Qin Wu for the Huawei data point,		The authors thank Martijn Schmidt, Qin Wu for the Huawei data point,
	Greg Hankins, Job Snijders, David Farmer, John Heasley, and Jakob		Greg Hankins, Job Snijders, David Farmer, John Heasley, and Jakob
	Heitz.		Heitz.
	10. Normative References		10. Normative References
	[IANA-WKC]		[IANA-WKC]
End of changes. 5 change blocks.
	6 lines changed or deleted		6 lines changed or added
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.47. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/