draft-ietf-grow-route-leak-detection-mitigation-04.txt		draft-ietf-grow-route-leak-detection-mitigation-05.txt
	IDR and SIDR K. Sriram, Ed.		IDR and SIDR K. Sriram, Ed.
	Internet-Draft USA NIST		Internet-Draft USA NIST
	Intended status: Standards Track A. Azimov, Ed.		Intended status: Standards Track A. Azimov, Ed.
	Expires: April 29, 2021 Yandex		Expires: October 30, 2021 Yandex
	October 26, 2020		April 28, 2021
	Methods for Detection and Mitigation of BGP Route Leaks		Methods for Detection and Mitigation of BGP Route Leaks
	draft-ietf-grow-route-leak-detection-mitigation-04		draft-ietf-grow-route-leak-detection-mitigation-05
	Abstract		Abstract
	Problem definition for route leaks and enumeration of types of route		Problem definition for route leaks and enumeration of types of route
	leaks are provided in RFC 7908. This document describes a new well-		leaks are provided in RFC 7908. This document describes a new well-
	known Large Community that provides a way for route-leak prevention,		known Large Community that provides a way for route-leak prevention,
	detection, and mitigation. The configuration process for this		detection, and mitigation. The configuration process for this
	Community can be automated with the methodology for setting BGP roles		Community can be automated with the methodology for setting BGP roles
	that is described in ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy draft.		that is described in ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy draft.
	skipping to change at page 1, line 36 ¶		skipping to change at page 1, line 36 ¶
	Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering		Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
	Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute		Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
	working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-		working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
	Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.		Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
	Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months		Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
	and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any		and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
	time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference		time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
	material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."		material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
	This Internet-Draft will expire on April 29, 2021.		This Internet-Draft will expire on October 30, 2021.
	Copyright Notice		Copyright Notice
	Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the		Copyright (c) 2021 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
	document authors. All rights reserved.		document authors. All rights reserved.
	This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal		This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
	Provisions Relating to IETF Documents		Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
	(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of		(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
	publication of this document. Please review these documents		publication of this document. Please review these documents
	carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect		carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
	to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must		to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
	include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of		include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
	the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as		the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
	skipping to change at page 8, line 48 ¶		skipping to change at page 8, line 48 ¶
	[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC		[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
	2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,		2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
	May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.		May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
	8.2. Informative References		8.2. Informative References
	[I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy]		[I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy]
	Azimov, A., Bogomazov, E., Bush, R., Patel, K., and K.		Azimov, A., Bogomazov, E., Bush, R., Patel, K., and K.
	Sriram, "Route Leak Prevention using Roles in Update and		Sriram, "Route Leak Prevention using Roles in Update and
	Open messages", draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy-13 (work in		Open messages", draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy-15 (work in
	progress), July 2020.		progress), January 2021.
	[RFC4264] Griffin, T. and G. Huston, "BGP Wedgies", RFC 4264,		[RFC4264] Griffin, T. and G. Huston, "BGP Wedgies", RFC 4264,
	DOI 10.17487/RFC4264, November 2005,		DOI 10.17487/RFC4264, November 2005,
	<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4264>.		<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4264>.
	[RFC7908] Sriram, K., Montgomery, D., McPherson, D., Osterweil, E.,		[RFC7908] Sriram, K., Montgomery, D., McPherson, D., Osterweil, E.,
	and B. Dickson, "Problem Definition and Classification of		and B. Dickson, "Problem Definition and Classification of
	BGP Route Leaks", RFC 7908, DOI 10.17487/RFC7908, June		BGP Route Leaks", RFC 7908, DOI 10.17487/RFC7908, June
	2016, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7908>.		2016, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7908>.
End of changes. 5 change blocks.
	7 lines changed or deleted		7 lines changed or added
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/